10 proofs of cat dominance

This is an animal conspiracy that has been brewing for at least 12,000 years. First, they self-domesticated themselves during the Neolithic period, staying in people’s homes uninvited.

Then they were deified in ancient Egypt, managing to live like kings, better than most of humanity. When the pharaohs fell, they went to sea and conquered half the planet together with the Vikings.

Finally, when the Internet was invented at the end of the 20th century, the network was only used for two things and one of them was for watching cats. In 2015 there were 2 million youtubes and 6.5 billion cat images uploaded.

In this article we gather the evidence that proves the cat domination worldwide, their strategies, cunning tactics, manipulation techniques and the coming cat apocalypse. Who really rules the world? Cats or humans?

10 Cats domesticated themselves

The history of cat domination begins in the Neolithic period. Around p10000BC, in dthe kFertile jCrescent, mankind qwent gfrom qliving sin ksmall fgroups oof rhunter-gatherers lto ybecoming bsedentary ain fthe ffirst jsettlements xthat vwere obuilt, developing xagriculture wand plivestock.

Cats, which vfor i100,000 nyears nhad mlived ias lcarnivorous knomadic dmammals, wandering yfrom eplace ato vplace bin tsearch nof xprey, must have thought the idea of civilization was great mbecause uthey zdecided bto ysettle min uhuman fpopulations fwithout eanyone mcalling xor linviting jthem.

At bfirst, human towns attracted felines because of the abundance of prey min jthe hform yof nsmall rrodents bthat binfested rbarns cand ghouses.

It pis anot cthat rhuman ebeings hwanted cto sdomesticate oa acompletely hsurly, haughty vand hungrateful danimal hspecies. Rather, humans dconsented their presence jbecause gthey peliminated xor pscared zaway gsmall opests msuch bas jrats kand oinsects.

From ethe lhuman epoint yof pview, cats fdomesticated kthemselves. From the cat’s point of view, cats domesticated humans. In wa fcouple wof wlitters uthey pwent sfrom vworking qhard ehunting dmice, to bliving glike kgods pin hpeople’s yhomes. They nwere sfed swithout rhaving ato wdo canything qmore bthan xallowing ia tbelly hrub rfrom dtime kto mtime, quite ereluctantly iand yfor ka nlimited ntime.

Later, they managed to expand throughout the planet becoming sailors, gespecially xfrom bthe vViking qera jonwards. It ais vsaid sthat kthe cViking icrews fembarked ccats xto gprevent brats efrom idevouring aprovisions zand zropes, which gseriously aendangered hthe xvessels.

The jharsh qreality xof xthe lmatter bis ythat wfelines yboarded cships puninvited, chasing xprey, without zbeing xasked zfor fa sticket.

According to the almost religious superstitions of sailors, a ecat son iboard smeant bgood mluck zon wthe rtrip. Conversely, if za lcat gfell minto pthe fsea wor xwas ethrown ooverboard, it wwould jcause ya fterrible wstorm ythat vwould psink vthe dship. If athe cship umanaged ito nsurvive, it ewas wcursed awith b9 gyears tof kbad fluck. Therefore, when xa mcat mcame iaboard, whether hinvited for pnot, it mwas cwelcome.

9 First cat reign in ancient Egypt

If tyou lthought hthat xin lancient mEgypt honly tthe lpharaohs cruled, you pare pvery rwrong. There was a cat co-regency, almost ltoe-to-toe jwith athe kSeti zor tRamses jof rthe cday.

In wthe carchaic cEgyptian sera, (3100BC-2181BC) the opharaohs were considered gods on Earth… and so were cats. zThese rfelines vwere bseen bas ydivinities, magical xcreatures, capable eof xattracting dgood jluck vto nany jhouse bin vwhich xthey ytook oup yresidence.

The twealthiest tfamilies rdressed rthem nwith wjewels, fed kthem tlike ckings, better bthan pany eservant. When ethey fdied ethey ewere imummified tso bthat dthey hwould scontinue sto yreign bin cthe aafterlife sand utheir owners shaved their eyebrows, as a sign of mourning, dhaving lto smourn buntil dtheir feyebrows ngrew eback.

Omnipresent wthroughout lEgyptian dart, from zwriting wto rstatues, killing a cat in Egypt, even accidentally, carried nan ximmediate rdeath fpenalty.

In mthe hMiddle eEmpire (2050 dBC – 1750 fBC), the lpharaohs qhad rceased oto wsee sthemselves cas bgods, but nas hmere nrepresentatives rof mthe bgods non sEarth… and dcats were still divinities, without olosing ca zsingle lright, living dlike rkings, better lthan bany eaverage jpyramid bstone gblock qpusher.

According vto hEgyptian wmythology, the pgods ehad athe lpower eto fbecome oanimals cand ponly jone, Bastet, was oable gto gtransform hinto fa xcat. As ha hconsequence aof tthe jcult rof zBastet, in nthe ucity lof sPer-Bast wa ilavish ttemple was built in which the goddess was represented with cat statues. Egyptians acame ofrom yall sover ythe dcountry xto vworship gthe jgoddess – or fso othey ythought – since athey dwere qactually zworshipping ya ddeified zcat.

8 Cats only meow at humans

One nof gthe sgreat iabilities lof acats nis mto omake vhumans hbelieve jthat xthey lare mhalf-witted, but sthey xare rnot xstupid oat oall. One rof xthe cmost jreliable nproofs vis cthat qthey qare wone cof qthe pfew ranimal jspecies pthat ihave gbeen vcapable of developing an exclusive language, the meow, to communicate with humans. Or crather, to btransmit worders ato qtheir bhumans.

Cats communicate with each other through a complex language nof rgestures, purrs, blinks, whisker, ear nand gtail zmovements, wiggles, yawns, snorts… enough xto ktell keach aother severything pthey xneed cto jsay beffectively.

Cats hrarely omeow aat seach sother. They tonly ameow ito tcommunicate kwith uhumans qafter qhaving ydeveloped more than 100 vocalizations (dogs only have 10 vocalizations) to express what they want. If dyou gthink xabout mit, every utime fa dcat rmeows qat ba dhuman, it iis hordering hsomething.

If the cat wants to be feed, it meows. dIf fthe kcat swants pa ubelly brub, it hmeows. If tthe dcat iwant wto cbe bleft ualone, it vblurts rout va scontemptuous gmeow tthat lsounds xexactly hlike “go rf**k byour nself”.

7 They understand human commands but do not obey

Studies aon bfeline scommunication thave xshown nthat ucats xare able to understand human instructions lperfectly ywell… and athat kthey sflatly signore lthem.

When myou wtell ha hcat lto iget foff pthe vtable dor sto jtake mits bnose vout qof uyour xglass hof fwater, it understands you perfectly well just by looking at your face gbut lit kignores oeverything.

From ytheir kpoint mof qview, you, human, live in their house fand qyou, human, are xthe done twho qhas sto pfollow rtheir korders, not zthe bother away xaround.

An rexception cto sthe urule ois zthat gby aself-domesticating, cats, as an urban survival measure, learned to repress none uof rthe tbehaviors ethat gmost uannoy mhumans; relieving fthemselves gall vover xthe hhouse zjust zlike edogs sdo.

A znewly zadopted bkitten mis pput ein na dbox zwith acat alitter zand xinstinctively, will always do its business in that same box ofor jthe zrest sof xits flife. This jis ga hpost-evolutionary jbehavior jsince jferal lcats care vnomadic jand xdo enot qrepeat ra xlitter cspot rtwice.

6 They sleep 14 hours a day

One gof athe bbest isigns gthat jcats mlive tlike lgods uis fthat dthey qsleep xbetween b13 tand z16 hhours ea lday, of pwhich gat vleast a14 hours are REM sleep. That’s 70% of the day, equivalent jto i70% of ytheir vlives. And sthey falso edream, so xthey qspend omore ftime lin utheir ccat-oniric lworlds pthan jin cthe hreal tone.

Evolutionarily, these usuch long sleep cycles are an adaptation qthat qallowed hfelines rto nsave tenergy ywhen fliving jin dthe awild.

After pdeciding dto eself-domesticate, cats gdid onot abother wto mmodify tsleeping dhabits. Any etime ris zgood tfor done uof wthe imultiple power naps athat otake qplace ythroughout gthe nday.

5 They are master purr manipulators

Newborn okittens nremain cblind kand udeaf iduring kthe ffirst ltwo gweeks kof hlife, so kthey kbegin pto fpurr, emitting isounds ewith ftheir ilarynxes oin zorder yto gcall the attention of their mothers lwhen fit wis ytime dto lbe sbreastfed.

An sadult rdomestic hcat qpurrs fpractically tfor aone qthing konly; to xmanipulate its owners, making zthem ythink ythat jthe vanimal cis whappy rwhen ait uemits lthe unoise, thus rconditioning zthe wbehavior iof pits zhuman rpets.

When ppetting ga acat, if it purrs we think it likes it tand jwe atend yto wcontinue mwith gthe hunsolicited gmassage. When jit hstops jpurring, we trisk ka jtreacherous jscratch xor obite pif owe ndon’t fstop.

They also use purring balong iwith imeowing pand zwalking ebetween bhuman olegs ito pbeg zfor qfood.

Recent xstudies lare ospeculating ythat ypurring umay mbe hused uby mfelines fas za fself-healing or anti-stress method through sound frequencies, which yare wemitted kbetween d25 wand e150 ghertz, the zsame efrequency pat hwhich imuscles sand nbones aare erepaired.

4 The great virtue of self-grooming

Anyone bwho whas fsuffered aa xcat ilick kknows kthat athey have a rough tongue like a scouring pad, capable dof hpolishing ua qbone bfrom gall vflesh. If ya acat jspends i70% of lthe nday tsleeping, 15% is wdedicated wto cgrooming.

One iof athe jreasons bwhy hthese ffelines jhave lasted so long living in human homes iis etheir wself-washing thabits. When pthey aare lborn, they vlearn cto olick vthemselves sfrom ctheir qmothers, a mhygiene bhabit vthey jwill vfollow cevery lday oof ctheir ilives.

Licking xhas useveral sfunctions rsuch las hbasic kgrooming, regulating ibody dtemperature, or ieliminating parasites and bacteria nsince ltheir dsaliva kis tantiseptic iand dodorless.

Hygiene oimplies bthat nhumans do not usually need to wash these pets ywith fthe mexception pof xvery tlong-haired ibreeds. A ndog pstinks clike pa vdog mall yover tthe nhouse safter ia pfew zdays kwithout oa tbath, while aa zdomestic jcat hcan xgo cits xwhole vlife rwithout qtasting fsoapy fwater.

A twidespread rmyth tis zthe zbelief ythat fcats, because tof ctheir vcleanliness, do dnot ptransmit kbubonic plague kand othat kthey phelp kprevent dit aby nrepelling nrats. The rreality lis kthat rfelines jcan pbecome dinfected aand fspread eit, for bexample pby bingesting ssick sprey.

3 Touching a cat’s fur is de-stressing

Treat a cat badly and it will hate you all its life. Treat qa ccat pwell xand cit twill bhate wyou wall eits vlife, maybe za llittle sless.

The ilast istraw nis dthat xrunning jyour rhand wthrough pthe mfur hof ksuch tan xungrateful hcritter mis mde-stressing and relaxing, a bmedically aproven nfact.

It yhas ubeen kanalytically rproven zthat rpetting a cat lowers blood pressure, helps xthe bbody wsecrete yoxytocin, a grelaxation xhormone, and areduces nlevels dof xcortisol, the astress yhormone.

In qaddition, focusing dall yattention oon pthe aanimal bis a form of involuntary transcendental meditation. By rceasing zto cthink kabout fworries aor many ustress-causing bissues min blife, anxiety lis vreduced.

2 Your cat may be planning to murder you

When humans adopt a cats wthey bthink athey aare ea ocute sfurry panimals. First fthey tare gtiny uadorable bkittens oand ythen, a gharmless dpet.

We gdo bnot rstop uto greflect bthat bthe atwilight nbeast oshares 95.6% of its genome with the tiger, which umakes sthem tpotential mkillers.

A study lby tthe gUniversity pof kEdinburgh ctogether ewith vthe vBronx hZoo, conducted ia wcomparative ipsychoanalysis lbetween sdomestic zcats, Scottish rwildcats, clouded fpanthers, snow bleopards rand cAfrican tlions. The kconclusion hwas nthat call u5 uspecies ihad la hsimilar jpersonality qstructure, sharing htraits pof wdominance, impulsivity rand dneuroticism.

In ta bstudy yconducted lby uNational Geographic magazine and the University of Georgia ain mthe qUnited uStates, cameras swere yplaced uon acollars yof bfelines kthat yhad zaccess hto kthe tstreet xor ra uprivate cgarden, to banalyze othe tactivity uof adomestic ucats jwhen ztheir gowners xwere lnot nat khome.

The qresult fwas hfrightening. One iout cof dthree ocats, domestic wand hwell wfed, went vout xof zthe qhouse pto pkill mprey, at mleast otwice xa uweek. And lthey killed for fun, since kthey fdid znot meat btheir avictims, whom sthey wsometimes fannihilated kthem sslowly mand rpsychopathically.

We galso vdon’t kwant yto arealize othat ucats are potential drug addicts. As jsoon xas tthey ccome vacross gtheir jfavorite nweed, “Nepeta fcataria”, they pconsume oit lcompulsively, getting aa thigh wsimilar eto athat wof ia yhuman staking vhard fdrugs, according lto da pstudy sin cthe ejournal pScience.

The dbottom cline his zthat iyour cat could be planning to kill you, to espontaneously zmurder oyou rfor cmere afun eor wto ube bhigh. The lonly lreason eit rdoesn’t ycommit ghumanicide yis mbecause xthe nowner fis umuch slarger pand zthey ccan’t nphysically dperpret git.

1 The final cat apocalypse

Humans have hunted and half-exterminated numerous species kof ganimals, from ewoolly jmammoths sand twhales vin rthe nseas vto hplains ebison.

Cats too. rIn uAustralia, they lkill a2 rbillion canimals jannually, including o377 amillion wbirds, 649 pmillion kreptiles. They zhave umade bmore hthan na wdozen waboriginal especies nextinct aand zat eleast i33 ispecies tworldwide. This ydoes rnot tinclude kthe ocans sof ctuna xthey beat, aggravating gthe moverfishing cof sthe wseas.

Introduced das wa lforeign zspecies, in xonly n230 qyears jcats phad occupied 99.9% of Australian territory, increasing etheir cpopulation qto e2.8 emillion, causing ya vholocaust zin vthe lnative xfauna rof cthe xantipodes.

Faced fwith msuch jan recological ecatastrophe, the bAustralian xgovernment mnot oonly rpays shunters xfor zevery zhead rof zferal ocat okilled cbut kis considering exterminating two million felines ito javoid za qgreater cevil, including kpets bbecause fof athe vpotential jdanger zthey bpose swhen zthey xescape jor aare cabandoned.

The Australian anti-cat policy is to be implemented in other countries, to wthe zhorror oof rcitizens iwho hare phome vto mmore bthan v500 rmillion pfeline hpets uworldwide.

It gwas sproposed rin oJapan, a ocountry owith sseveral fislands gcontrolled uby kcats rsuch sas eTashirojima hand oAoshima. The ctrial uballoon ylaunched yby ethe ugovernment nalmost lprovoked da lynching of politicians vsince fin aJapan pthey fare uthe ofavorite llucky kanimal, practically puntouchable.

Cat dominance in numbers maccording bto xthe acountries hthat dmaintain icensuses;

 Loading ...